{"id":10911,"date":"2026-08-31T15:07:41","date_gmt":"2026-08-31T19:07:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mclawfirm.com\/?p=10911"},"modified":"2026-08-31T15:41:07","modified_gmt":"2026-08-31T19:41:07","slug":"abd-vatandaslik-basvurusu-reddedilirse-ne-olur","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mclawfirm.com\/tr\/abd-vatandaslik-basvurusu-reddedilirse-ne-olur\/","title":{"rendered":"ABD Vatanda\u015fl\u0131k Ba\u015fvurusu Reddedilirse Ne Olur?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p data-path-to-node=\"3\">ABD vatanda\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (naturalization) ba\u015fvurdunuz ve USCIS ba\u015fvurunuzu reddetti. <strong>Peki bundan sonra ne olur? USCIS&#8217;in ret karar\u0131 s\u00fcrecin sonu mudur?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"4\"><strong>Hay\u0131r, en az\u0131ndan her zaman de\u011fil.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"5\">ABD vatanda\u015fl\u0131k hukukunun en \u00f6nemli \u00f6zelliklerinden biri, naturalization kararlar\u0131n\u0131n hem idari hem de yarg\u0131sal denetime tabi olmas\u0131d\u0131r. <strong>USCIS bir N-400 ba\u015fvurusunu reddetti\u011finde, \u00f6nce Form N-336 ile idari inceleme (hearing), ard\u0131ndan uygun ko\u015fullarda Federal District Court&#8217;ta yarg\u0131sal inceleme yollar\u0131 g\u00fcndeme gelebilir.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"6\"><strong>Bunlardan ayr\u0131 olarak, USCIS m\u00fclakattan (examination) sonra makul s\u00fcrede karar vermezse, 8 U.S.C. \u00a7 1447(b) kapsam\u0131nda 120 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre dolduktan sonra federal mahkemeye ba\u015fvurma hakk\u0131 do\u011fabilir.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"7\">Bu yaz\u0131da continuous residence ve good moral character \u015fartlar\u0131ndan cezai ge\u00e7mi\u015f ve vergi sorunlar\u0131na; N-336 s\u00fcrecinden 120 g\u00fcnl\u00fck kurala ve federal mahkemedeki de novo review standard\u0131na kadar vatanda\u015fl\u0131k s\u00fcrecinin kritik hukuki konular\u0131n\u0131 ele al\u0131yoruz.<\/p>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"9\"><strong>ABD Vatanda\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Bir &#8220;Hak&#8221; m\u0131d\u0131r?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"10\">ABD vatanda\u015fl\u0131k hukukunu bir\u00e7ok \u00fclkedeki sistemlerden ay\u0131ran nokta \u015fudur: <strong>Kanunun \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc t\u00fcm \u015fartlar\u0131 sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispatlayan bir ba\u015fvuru sahibinin naturalization talebi, salt idarenin takdirine b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f de\u011fildir.<\/strong> USCIS&#8217;in, \u015fartlar\u0131 sa\u011flayan bir ki\u015fiye keyfi gerek\u00e7elerle vatanda\u015fl\u0131k vermeme konusunda s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z takdir yetkisi yoktur.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"11\">Ancak bu tablonun iki \u00f6nemli tamamlay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 var:<\/p>\n<ul data-path-to-node=\"12\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"12,0,0\"><strong>\u0130spat y\u00fck\u00fc ba\u015fvuru sahibindedir:<\/strong> Yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihat uyar\u0131nca uygunluk \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koymak ba\u015fvurana d\u00fc\u015fer ve teredd\u00fctler genellikle ba\u015fvuran\u0131n aleyhine yorumlan\u0131r (Berenyi v. District Director, 385 U.S. 630 (1967)).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"12,1,0\"><strong>Mahkemelerin &#8220;hakkaniyet&#8221; yetkisi yoktur:<\/strong> Federal mahkemeler, yasal \u015fartlar\u0131 sa\u011flamayan bir ki\u015fiye ac\u0131ma veya adalet duygusuyla vatanda\u015fl\u0131k veremez (INS v. Pangilinan, 486 U.S. 875 (1988)).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"13\"><strong>S\u00fcre\u00e7 USCIS&#8217;te idari bir de\u011ferlendirmeyle ba\u015flar; ancak belirli durumlarda federal mahkemeye ta\u015f\u0131nabilir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ret karar\u0131 her zaman s\u00fcrecin sonu anlam\u0131na gelmez.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2><strong>Vatanda\u015fl\u0131k Ba\u015fvurusunun Temel \u015eartlar\u0131<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Genel (INA \u00a7 316) kural kapsam\u0131nda naturalization i\u00e7in ba\u015fl\u0131ca \u015fartlar \u015funlard\u0131r:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>\u015eart<\/th>\n<th>Genel kural (5 y\u0131l)<\/th>\n<th>ABD vatanda\u015f\u0131 e\u015fe dayal\u0131 ba\u015fvuru (3 y\u0131l)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Ya\u015f<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>18+<\/td>\n<td>18+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Stat\u00fc<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Ge\u00e7erli Green Card (LPR)<\/td>\n<td>Ge\u00e7erli Green Card (LPR)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Continuous residence<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>5 y\u0131l<\/td>\n<td>3 y\u0131l<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Physical presence<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>En az 30 ay<\/td>\n<td>En az 18 ay<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Eyalet\/USCIS b\u00f6lgesi ikameti<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Son 3 ay<\/td>\n<td>Son 3 ay<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Good moral character<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>5 y\u0131ll\u0131k statutory period<\/td>\n<td>3 y\u0131ll\u0131k statutory period<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>\u0130ngilizce + civics s\u0131nav\u0131<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Evet (istisnalar mevcut)<\/td>\n<td>Evet (istisnalar mevcut)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Anayasaya ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k ve yemin<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Evet<\/td>\n<td>Evet<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"17\">Buna ek olarak 18-26 ya\u015f aral\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ABD&#8217;de bulunmu\u015f erkekler i\u00e7in Selective Service kayd\u0131 da de\u011ferlendirmeye girebilir.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"18\">Uygulamada en \u00e7ok sorun \u00e7\u0131karan iki ba\u015fl\u0131k continuous residence ve good moral character&#8217;d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"19\"><strong>Continuous Residence: Devaml\u0131 \u0130kamet \u015eart\u0131<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"20\">Continuous residence, ki\u015finin ABD ile ikamet ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kesintiye u\u011framadan devam etmesini ifade eder. Yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ge\u00e7irilen s\u00fcreler burada belirleyici olabilir:<\/p>\n<ul data-path-to-node=\"21\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"21,0,0\"><strong>6 aydan uzun, 1 y\u0131ldan k\u0131sa kesintisiz yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131 kal\u0131\u015f:<\/strong> Continuous residence&#8217;\u0131n kesildi\u011fine dair \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclebilir bir karine do\u011furur. Ba\u015fvuru sahibi, ABD&#8217;deki ikametini, i\u015fini, ailesel ve ekonomik ba\u011flar\u0131n\u0131 belgeleyerek bu karineyi \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctebilir.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"21,1,0\"><strong>1 y\u0131l veya daha uzun kesintisiz yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131 kal\u0131\u015f:<\/strong> Continuous residence&#8217;\u0131 kural olarak keser. Bu durumda genellikle yeni bir bekleme s\u00fcresi i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar (belirli h\u00e2llerde Form N-470 ile koruma m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilir).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"22\"><strong>Continuous residence (devaml\u0131 ikamet) ile physical presence (fiili bulunma) farkl\u0131 \u015fartlard\u0131r.<\/strong> K\u0131sa ama \u00e7ok say\u0131da seyahat continuous residence&#8217;\u0131 kesmese bile, toplam fiziki bulunma s\u00fcresini 30 (veya 18) ay\u0131n alt\u0131na d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrebilir.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"23\">Bu nedenle uzun s\u00fcreli yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131 seyahati bulunan ki\u015filerin ba\u015fvurudan \u00f6nce takvimlerini ve belgelerini dikkatle de\u011ferlendirmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"24\"><strong>Good Moral Character Ne Demektir?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"25\">&#8220;\u0130yi ahlaki karakter&#8221; olarak \u00e7evrilse de good moral character (GMC), g\u00fcnl\u00fck dildeki &#8220;iyi insan olma&#8221; de\u011ferlendirmesi de\u011fil, vatanda\u015fl\u0131k hukukunda teknik bir hukuki kavramd\u0131r (INA \u00a7 101(f), 8 C.F.R. \u00a7 316.10).<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"26\"><strong>GMC de\u011ferlendirmesinde g\u00fcndeme gelebilecek ba\u015fl\u0131klar:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul data-path-to-node=\"27\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"27,0,0\"><strong>Belirli su\u00e7lardan mahk\u00fbmiyet, arrest record veya cezai ge\u00e7mi\u015f<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"27,1,0\"><strong>USCIS&#8217;e veya ba\u015fka bir resm\u00ee s\u00fcre\u00e7te yanl\u0131\u015f\/yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 beyan, yalan beyan<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"27,2,0\"><strong>Vergi y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin yerine getirilmemesi<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"27,3,0\"><strong>Child support (\u00e7ocuk nafakas\u0131) y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin ihlali<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"27,4,0\"><strong>Kumar, alkol veya uyu\u015fturucuyla ilgili belirli su\u00e7lar<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"27,5,0\"><strong>Yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 oy kullanma veya vatanda\u015fl\u0131k iddias\u0131nda bulunma<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"28\"><strong>Kal\u0131c\u0131 ve Ko\u015fullu Engeller<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"29\">Baz\u0131 durumlar kal\u0131c\u0131 engel olu\u015fturur ve s\u00fcre ge\u00e7mesiyle ortadan kalkmaz:<\/p>\n<ul data-path-to-node=\"30\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"30,0,0\"><strong>Cinayet (murder) mahk\u00fbmiyeti<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"30,1,0\"><strong>29 Kas\u0131m 1990 tarihinde veya sonras\u0131nda verilmi\u015f aggravated felony mahk\u00fbmiyeti<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"31\">Di\u011fer bir\u00e7ok durum ise statutory period i\u00e7inde meydana gelmi\u015fse ko\u015fullu engel olu\u015fturur.<\/p>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"32\"><strong>Statutory Period: Neden Son 5 (veya 3) Y\u0131l \u00d6nemlidir?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"33\">GMC de\u011ferlendirmesinde as\u0131l inceleme d\u00f6nemi, ba\u015fvuru tarihinden geriye do\u011fru 5 y\u0131l (e\u015fe dayal\u0131 ba\u015fvurularda 3 y\u0131l) ve karar\/yemin tarihine kadar uzanan d\u00f6nemdir.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"34\">Ancak burada iki kritik istisna vard\u0131r:<\/p>\n<ol start=\"1\" data-path-to-node=\"35\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"35,0,0\"><strong>USCIS bu d\u00f6nemin d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki davran\u0131\u015flara da bakabilir.<\/strong> INA \u00a7 316(e) ve 8 C.F.R. \u00a7 316.10(a)(2) uyar\u0131nca, statutory period \u00f6ncesindeki davran\u0131\u015flar, mevcut karakterin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde dikkate al\u0131nabilir.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"35,1,0\"><strong>Eski bir olay g\u00f6\u00e7menlik stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc ayr\u0131ca etkileyebilir.<\/strong> \u00d6rne\u011fin bir su\u00e7 crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT) veya aggravated felony kapsam\u0131ndaysa ve ki\u015fiyi deportable (s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilebilir) h\u00e2le getiriyorsa, mesele GMC ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 kalmaz &#8211; vatanda\u015fl\u0131k ba\u015fvurusu bizzat s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcrecini tetikleyebilir.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"36\">Bu nedenle &#8220;Olay 5 y\u0131ldan eski, art\u0131k \u00f6nemi yok&#8221; \u015feklinde bir genelleme yapmak do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"37\"><strong>\u00d6nemli Uyar\u0131: Removal Proceedings<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"38\">8 U.S.C. \u00a7 1429 uyar\u0131nca, <strong>ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda derdest bir removal (s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131) i\u015flemi varken USCIS naturalization ba\u015fvurusunu onaylayamaz<\/strong>. Cezai ge\u00e7mi\u015fi olan dosyalarda ba\u015fvuru yapmadan \u00f6nce bu riskin de\u011ferlendirilmesi hayati \u00f6nemdedir.<\/p>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"39\"><strong>Her Cezai Ge\u00e7mi\u015f Vatanda\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n Reddi Anlam\u0131na Gelmez<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"40\">Ge\u00e7mi\u015fte bir tutuklama, su\u00e7lama veya mahk\u00fbmiyet bulunmas\u0131 otomatik olarak &#8220;bu ki\u015fi vatanda\u015f olamaz&#8221; demek de\u011fildir. De\u011ferlendirme teknik ve olaya \u00f6zg\u00fcd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"41\"><strong>Bir tutuklama kayd\u0131 varsa, yaln\u0131zca kayd\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na de\u011fil olay\u0131n tamam\u0131na bak\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul data-path-to-node=\"42\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"42,0,0\"><strong>Ki\u015fi neden g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131 veya tutukland\u0131?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"42,1,0\"><strong>Hangi su\u00e7 isnat edildi?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"42,2,0\"><strong>Dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131 m\u0131, dosya nas\u0131l sonu\u00e7land\u0131?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"42,3,0\"><strong>Mahk\u00fbmiyet oldu mu, su\u00e7lama d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc m\u00fc?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"42,4,0\"><strong>Nihai karar ve infaz durumu ne oldu?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"43\"><strong>Bunlar\u0131n mahkeme karar\u0131 (certified disposition) ve polis kay\u0131tlar\u0131yla birlikte USCIS&#8217;e sunulmas\u0131 \u00f6nemlidir.<\/strong> Memurun dosyada yaln\u0131zca bir tutuklama kayd\u0131 g\u00f6rmesiyle, olay\u0131n hukuki ge\u00e7mi\u015fini belgeleriyle g\u00f6rmesi aras\u0131nda ciddi fark vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"44\"><strong>Ayr\u0131ca g\u00f6\u00e7menlik hukukunda &#8220;conviction&#8221; tan\u0131m\u0131 eyalet ceza hukukundakinden farkl\u0131d\u0131r. Eyalet hukukuna g\u00f6re silinmi\u015f (expunged) veya ertelenmi\u015f baz\u0131 kararlar, g\u00f6\u00e7menlik ama\u00e7lar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan h\u00e2l\u00e2 mahk\u00fbmiyet say\u0131labilir.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"45\"><strong>\u015eartlar\u0131 Sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131z H\u00e2lde Ba\u015fvurunuz Reddedilebilir mi?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"46\">Evet, uygulamada bu t\u00fcr durumlarla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131labiliyor. Ba\u015fvuru sahibi continuous residence (devaml\u0131 ikamet) \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131yor, GMC a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan engeli bulunmuyor ve s\u0131navlar\u0131 ge\u00e7ebilecek durumda olsa dahi, tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 veya zorlama gerek\u00e7elerle olumsuz karar verilebiliyor.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"47\"><strong>S\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclen \u00f6rnekler:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul data-path-to-node=\"48\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"48,0,0\"><strong>Belge eksikli\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi: <\/strong>Federal vergi beyannameleri sunulmu\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen eyalet vergi belgelerinin sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle sorun \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"48,1,0\"><strong>Ge\u00e7mi\u015f evlilik\/bo\u015fanma: <\/strong>&#8220;\u00d6nceki evlilik hukuken sona ermeden yeni evlilik ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f olabilir&#8221; \u015feklinde tespitler.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"48,2,0\"><strong>Ge\u00e7mi\u015f g\u00f6\u00e7menlik dosyalar\u0131n\u0131n yeniden a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131: <\/strong>\u00d6zellikle Green Card evlilik \u00fczerinden al\u0131nm\u0131\u015fsa, y\u0131llar \u00f6nceki s\u00fcrecin naturalization a\u015famas\u0131nda yeniden sorgulanmas\u0131.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"49\">Bu t\u00fcr hukuken tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 tespitler ret karar\u0131na yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, karara kar\u015f\u0131 kullan\u0131labilecek hukuki yollar mevcuttur.<\/p>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"50\"><strong>\u0130lk Ad\u0131m: Form N-336<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"51\">USCIS bir N-400 ba\u015fvurusunu reddetti\u011finde ba\u015fvurulabilecek temel idari yol Form N-336, Request for a Hearing on a Decision in Naturalization Proceedings (INA \u00a7 336(a)) ba\u015fvurusudur.<\/p>\n<h3 data-path-to-node=\"52\"><strong>Kritik: 30 G\u00fcnl\u00fck S\u00fcre<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"53\"><strong>N-336, ret karar\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 30 takvim g\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7inde dosyalanmal\u0131d\u0131r<\/strong> (posta yoluyla tebli\u011fde genellikle 33 g\u00fcn). S\u00fcresinde yap\u0131lmayan ba\u015fvurular kural olarak reddedilir. Bu s\u00fcre ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131l\u0131rsa idari inceleme yolu kapan\u0131r ve genellikle yeniden N-400 dosyalamak gerekir &#8211; ki bu, federal mahkeme yolunu da fiilen kapat\u0131r.<\/p>\n<h3 data-path-to-node=\"54\"><strong>N-336 Nedir, Ne De\u011fildir?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"55\"><strong>N-336 ayn\u0131 ba\u015fvurunun tekrar g\u00f6nderilmesi de\u011fildir. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"55\">Ba\u015fvuruda:<\/p>\n<ul data-path-to-node=\"56\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"56,0,0\"><strong>Ret karar\u0131ndaki hukuki veya maddi hatalar\u0131n somut bi\u00e7imde ortaya konulmas\u0131,<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"56,1,0\"><strong>Bu hatalar\u0131 destekleyen yeni veya g\u00f6zden ka\u00e7m\u0131\u015f belgelerin sunulmas\u0131,<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"56,2,0\"><strong>Gerekti\u011finde bir hukuki brief (legal brief) haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 <span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, 'Noto Sans', sans-serif, 'Apple Color Emoji', 'Segoe UI Emoji', 'Segoe UI Symbol', 'Noto Color Emoji';\">\u00f6nemlidir.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3 data-path-to-node=\"58\"><strong>S\u00fcre\u00e7 Nas\u0131l \u0130\u015fler?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul data-path-to-node=\"59\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"59,0,0\">USCIS, s\u00fcresinde dosyalanan N-336 \u00fczerine kural olarak 180 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde hearing planlamakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr (8 C.F.R. \u00a7 336.2(b)). Uygulamada gecikmeler yayg\u0131nd\u0131r.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"59,1,0\">Dosya, ilk karar\u0131 veren memurdan farkl\u0131 bir memura atan\u0131r; bu memurun ayn\u0131 veya daha \u00fcst kademede olmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"59,2,0\">Yeni bir m\u00fclakat yap\u0131labilir; memur idari kayd\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131 inceleyebilir, yeni belge veya ifade isteyebilir.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"59,3,0\">USCIS karar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fi\u015ftirebilir veya ret karar\u0131nda \u0131srar edebilir.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3 data-path-to-node=\"60\"><strong>N-336 mi, Yeni N-400 m\u00fc?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"61\">Her durumda N-336 en iyi se\u00e7enek de\u011fildir. \u00d6rne\u011fin ret, \u0130ngilizce\/civics s\u0131nav\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7ilememesinden kaynaklan\u0131yorsa yeni bir N-400 daha h\u0131zl\u0131 ve ucuz olabilir. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k hukuki bir hata s\u00f6z konusuysa ve federal mahkeme yolu hedefleniyorsa, N-336 zorunlu bir a\u015famad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"62\">Form \u00fccretleri de\u011fi\u015fmektedir; ba\u015fvurudan \u00f6nce mutlaka g\u00fcncel \u00fccret ve <a href=\"http:\/\/www.uscis.gov\/n-336\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">dosyalama adresini<\/a> kontrol edin.<\/p>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"63\"><strong>N-336 Reddedilirse Federal Mahkemeye Gidilebilir mi?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"64\"><strong>Belirli ko\u015fullarda, evet.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"65\">8 U.S.C. \u00a7 1421(c) (INA \u00a7 310(c)) uyar\u0131nca, N-336 s\u00fcrecinden sonra da ret karar\u0131 devam ederse, ba\u015fvuru sahibi ikamet etti\u011fi yerdeki U.S. District Court&#8217;ta dava a\u00e7abilir.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"66\"><strong>\u00dc\u00e7 kritik nokta:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol start=\"1\" data-path-to-node=\"67\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"67,0,0\"><strong>T\u00fcketme \u015fart\u0131 (exhaustion):<\/strong> Federal mahkemeye gidebilmek i\u00e7in \u00f6nce N-336 s\u00fcrecinin tamamlanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir. N-336 dosyalanmadan do\u011frudan dava a\u00e7\u0131lamaz.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"67,1,0\"><strong>Dava s\u00fcresi:<\/strong> Dava, N-336 karar\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 120 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r (8 C.F.R. \u00a7 310.5(b)).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"67,2,0\"><strong>Yetkili mahkeme:<\/strong> Ba\u015fvuru sahibinin ikamet etti\u011fi yarg\u0131 \u00e7evresindeki federal district court. \u00d6rne\u011fin New Jersey&#8217;de ikamet eden bir ba\u015fvuru sahibi i\u00e7in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"68\"><strong>De Novo Review Nedir?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"69\"><strong>Bu, vatanda\u015fl\u0131k hukukundaki en g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc korumalardan biridir.<\/strong> \u00a7 1421(c) a\u00e7\u0131k bi\u00e7imde \u015funu \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcr: Mahkeme kendi maddi vak\u0131a tespitlerini ve hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturur ve ba\u015fvuru sahibinin talebi h\u00e2linde de novo bir duru\u015fma yapar.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"70\"><strong>Yani federal h\u00e2kim, &#8220;USCIS memuru makul davranm\u0131\u015f m\u0131?&#8221; sorusuyla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 de\u011fildir. Mahkeme:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul data-path-to-node=\"71\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"71,0,0\"><strong>Vatanda\u015fl\u0131k \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lan\u0131p kar\u015f\u0131lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak de\u011ferlendirir,<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"71,1,0\"><strong>Gerekti\u011finde delil ve tan\u0131k ifadesi alabilir,<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"71,2,0\"><strong>USCIS&#8217;in de\u011ferlendirmesinden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak kendi hukuki sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131r.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"72\">Bu, \u00e7o\u011fu g\u00f6\u00e7menlik karar\u0131nda ge\u00e7erli olan s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 (&#8220;keyf\u00eelik denetimi&#8221;) standard\u0131ndan \u00e7ok daha g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir denetimden ge\u00e7er.<\/p>\n<h3 data-path-to-node=\"73\"><strong>Davaya G\u00f6\u00e7menlik H\u00e2kimi mi Bakar?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"74\"><strong>Hay\u0131r. S\u00f6z konusu olan, Immigration Court&#8217;taki bir g\u00f6\u00e7menlik h\u00e2kimi (Immigration Judge) de\u011fildir.<\/strong> Dava, Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n III. maddesi uyar\u0131nca atanm\u0131\u015f, \u00f6m\u00fcr boyu g\u00f6rev g\u00fcvencesine sahip bir Article III federal judge \u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcr. Vatanda\u015fl\u0131k hukukunun di\u011fer g\u00f6\u00e7menlik s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinden ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 en \u00f6nemli noktalardan biri budur.<\/p>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"75\"><strong>Vatanda\u015fl\u0131k M\u00fclakat\u0131ndan Sonra 120 G\u00fcn Ge\u00e7erse Ne Olur?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"76\">Ret karar\u0131ndan tamamen ayr\u0131 bir federal mahkeme mekanizmas\u0131 daha vard\u0131r: USCIS&#8217;in m\u00fclakattan (examination) sonra karar vermemesi.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"77\"><strong>8 U.S.C. \u00a7 1447(b) (INA \u00a7 336(b)) uyar\u0131nca, USCIS vatanda\u015fl\u0131k examination&#8217;\u0131ndan sonra 120 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar vermezse, ba\u015fvuru sahibi ikamet etti\u011fi yerdeki Federal District Court&#8217;a ba\u015fvurabilir.<\/strong> Mahkeme bu durumda iki se\u00e7ene\u011fe sahiptir: Meseleyi kendisi karara ba\u011flar, veya Dosyay\u0131 talimatla USCIS&#8217;e iade eder.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>\u00d6nemli Bir Ayr\u0131m: \u00a7 1447(b) &#8211; <a href=\"https:\/\/mclawfirm.com\/tr\/bekleyen-green-card-basvurulari-nasil-hizlandirilir\/\">Mandamus<\/a><\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Bu iki yol s\u0131kl\u0131kla kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r, ancak farkl\u0131d\u0131rlar:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Kriter<\/th>\n<th>\u00a7 1447(b) dilek\u00e7esi<\/th>\n<th>Mandamus \/ APA davas\u0131<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Dayanak<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>8 U.S.C. \u00a7 1447(b)<\/td>\n<td>28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1361 ve\/veya APA (5 U.S.C. \u00a7 555(b), \u00a7 706(1))<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Ne zaman<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>M\u00fclakat yap\u0131ld\u0131, \u00fczerinden 120 g\u00fcn ge\u00e7ti, karar yok<\/td>\n<td>Genellikle m\u00fclakat \u00f6ncesi a\u015famalarda makul olmayan gecikme (\u00f6r. m\u00fclakat hi\u00e7 planlanm\u0131yor)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Standart<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>\u00d6zel, kanunla tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f bir yetki<\/td>\n<td>&#8220;Unreasonable delay&#8221; daha zor bir standart<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Mahkemenin yetkisi<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Kendisi karar verebilir veya talimatla iade edebilir<\/td>\n<td>Kural olarak USCIS&#8217;i karar vermeye zorlar (hangi karar\u0131 verece\u011fini belirleyemez)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"81\">K\u0131sacas\u0131: M\u00fclakat yap\u0131ld\u0131ysa ve 120 g\u00fcn ge\u00e7tiyse as\u0131l ara\u00e7 \u00a7 1447(b)&#8217;dir; mandamus ise daha \u00e7ok m\u00fclakat \u00f6ncesi gecikmeler i\u00e7in g\u00fcndeme gelir.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"82\">Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurunuzun uzun s\u00fcredir pending olmas\u0131, her durumda sadece beklemek zorunda oldu\u011funuz anlam\u0131na gelmez.<\/p>\n<h3 data-path-to-node=\"83\"><strong>\u0130ki S\u00fcreci Birbirinden Ay\u0131r\u0131n<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul data-path-to-node=\"84\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"84,0,0\"><strong>USCIS ba\u015fvuruyu reddettiyse:<\/strong> 30 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde N-336 \u2192 gerekirse 120 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde \u00a7 1421(c) davas\u0131 (de novo review).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"84,1,0\"><strong>USCIS m\u00fclakattan sonra karar vermiyorsa:<\/strong> 120 g\u00fcn\u00fcn dolmas\u0131yla \u00a7 1447(b) dilek\u00e7esi.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"85\"><strong>Evlilik \u00dczerinden Al\u0131nan Green Card Yeniden \u0130ncelenebilir mi?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"86\"><strong>Evet.<\/strong> Uygulamada vatanda\u015fl\u0131k ba\u015fvurusunun dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ge\u00e7mi\u015f g\u00f6\u00e7menlik s\u00fcre\u00e7leri naturalization a\u015famas\u0131nda yeniden g\u00fcndeme gelebilir. USCIS, ki\u015finin LPR stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc hukuka uygun bi\u00e7imde kazan\u0131p kazanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 inceleme yetkisine sahiptir.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"87\"><strong>\u00d6rne\u011fin:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul data-path-to-node=\"88\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"88,0,0\"><strong>\u00d6nceki evlili\u011fin hukuken sona erip ermedi\u011fi,<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"88,1,0\"><strong>Bo\u015fanma belgelerindeki eksiklikler,<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"88,2,0\"><strong>&#8220;\u00d6nceki evlilik sona ermeden ikinci evlilik yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olabilir&#8221; \u015feklinde tespitler.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"89\">Bu t\u00fcr bir tespit yaln\u0131zca vatanda\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011fil, mevcut Green Card stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc de riske atabilir.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"90\">USCIS&#8217;in tespiti hukuken tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131ysa N-336 ve gerekti\u011finde federal mahkeme s\u00fcreci kritik h\u00e2le gelir.<\/p>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"91\"><strong>Vergi Sorunlar\u0131 Vatanda\u015fl\u0131k Ba\u015fvurusunu Etkiler mi?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"92\"><strong>Evet<\/strong> &#8211; ancak her vergi meselesi otomatik ret anlam\u0131na gelmez.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"93\"><strong>Belirleyici olan hususlar:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul data-path-to-node=\"94\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"94,0,0\"><strong>Sorunun niteli\u011fi (beyanname verilmemesi mi, \u00f6denmemi\u015f bor\u00e7 mu, kas\u0131tl\u0131 ka\u00e7ak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k m\u0131?)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"94,1,0\"><strong>IRS ile yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir \u00f6deme plan\u0131 (installment agreement) veya ba\u015fka bir \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcn bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"94,2,0\"><strong>&#8220;Nonresident&#8221; olarak beyanname verilmi\u015f olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (bu, LPR stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn terk edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcndeme getirebilir)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"94,3,0\"><strong>USCIS&#8217;e hangi belgelerin sunuldu\u011fu<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"95\"><strong>Uygulamada belge eksikliklerinin de ret gerek\u00e7esi h\u00e2line getirilmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclebilir.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"96\">\u00d6rne\u011fin federal tax return sunulmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen state tax return sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle olumsuz karar verilmesi h\u00e2linde, ret karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuki dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131ca de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"97\"><strong>M\u00fclakata Avukatla Gitmek Gerekir mi?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"98\"><strong>Her ba\u015fvuruda avukat bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine dair bir kural yoktur.<\/strong> Hi\u00e7bir komplikasyonu bulunmayan bir ki\u015fi, gerekli \u00f6n de\u011ferlendirmeyi yapt\u0131ktan sonra kendi ba\u015fvurusunu yapmay\u0131 tercih edebilir.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"99\"><strong>Ancak \u015fu durumlarda avukat deste\u011fi \u00f6nemli h\u00e2le gelir:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul data-path-to-node=\"100\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"100,0,0\"><strong>Tutuklama kayd\u0131, su\u00e7 kayd\u0131 veya ge\u00e7mi\u015f mahk\u00fbmiyet<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"100,1,0\"><strong>Vergi veya \u00e7ocuk yard\u0131m\u0131 problemleri<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"100,2,0\"><strong>Uzun yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131 seyahatleri \/ continuous residence sorunu<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"100,3,0\"><strong>Ge\u00e7mi\u015f evlilik veya bo\u015fanmayla ilgili hukuki belirsizlikler<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"100,4,0\"><strong>\u00d6nceki g\u00f6\u00e7menlik ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda tutars\u0131zl\u0131k veya soru i\u015faretleri<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"101\"><strong>Avukat M\u00fclakatta Ne Yapabilir?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"102\">M\u00fclakat esas olarak USCIS memuru ile ba\u015fvuru sahibi aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7er; avukat ba\u015fvuru sahibinin yerine cevap veremez. Ancak avukat\u0131n orada bulunmas\u0131, \u00f6zellikle komplike dosyalarda \u00f6nemli bir koruma sa\u011flar:<\/p>\n<ul data-path-to-node=\"103\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"103,0,0\"><strong>Hukuken uygun olmayan veya kapsam\u0131 a\u015fan sorulara itiraz edebilir,<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"103,1,0\"><strong>Memurun ba\u015fvuru sahibini belirli bir beyana zorlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde m\u00fcdahale edebilir,<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"103,2,0\"><strong>Kayda ge\u00e7irilmesi gereken hususlar\u0131 netle\u015ftirebilir,<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"103,3,0\"><strong>Dosyan\u0131n ileride N-336 veya federal mahkemeye ta\u015f\u0131nabilece\u011fini bilerek kay\u0131t olu\u015fturur.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"104\">M\u00fclakatta olu\u015fan kay\u0131t ve USCIS&#8217;in ortaya koydu\u011fu gerek\u00e7eler, sonraki hukuki s\u00fcre\u00e7lerde belirleyici olabilir.<\/p>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"105\"><strong>Ba\u015fvurudan \u00d6nce Dosyan\u0131z\u0131 De\u011ferlendirin<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"106\">Vatanda\u015fl\u0131k ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda en kritik ad\u0131m, ba\u015fvuruyu g\u00f6ndermeden \u00f6nce potansiyel problemleri tespit etmektir. \u00d6zellikle cezai ge\u00e7mi\u015f, arrest record, vergi sorunlar\u0131, uzun yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131 seyahatleri, ge\u00e7mi\u015f evlilikler veya \u00f6nceki g\u00f6\u00e7menlik dosyalar\u0131nda komplikasyon varsa, bunlar\u0131n \u00f6nceden de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"107\">Unutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r ki bir N-400 ba\u015fvurusu, USCIS&#8217;in ge\u00e7mi\u015f dosyan\u0131z\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131 yeniden incelemesine kap\u0131 a\u00e7ar. Sorunlu bir dosyada ba\u015fvuru, ret karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6tesinde stat\u00fc kayb\u0131 riski de do\u011furabilir.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"108\">Dosya ger\u00e7ekten sorunsuzsa ki\u015fi kendi ba\u015fvurusunu yapabilir. Ancak m\u00fclakatta beklenmedik bir problem \u00e7\u0131karsa veya USCIS tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 bir gerek\u00e7eyle olumsuz pozisyon almaya ba\u015flarsa, hukuki destek almak i\u00e7in ret karar\u0131n\u0131 beklemek \u00e7o\u011fu zaman en iyi yakla\u015f\u0131m de\u011fildir. Erken m\u00fcdahale, problemin N-336 veya federal mahkeme a\u015famas\u0131na ula\u015fmadan \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesini sa\u011flayabilir.<\/p>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"109\"><strong>Ret Karar\u0131 Her Zaman S\u00fcrecin Sonu De\u011fildir<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"110\">USCIS&#8217;in verdi\u011fi ret karar\u0131, uygun hukuki ko\u015fullar bulundu\u011funda nihai s\u00f6z olmak zorunda de\u011fildir:<\/p>\n<ol start=\"1\" data-path-to-node=\"111\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"111,0,0\"><strong>Ret h\u00e2linde:<\/strong> 30 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde Form N-336 ile karar\u0131n yeniden de\u011ferlendirilmesi istenebilir.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"111,1,0\"><strong>N-336 sonras\u0131nda ret devam ederse:<\/strong> 120 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde federal district court&#8217;ta \u00a7 1421(c) davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilir ve ba\u015fvuru, ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir Article III h\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan de novo yeniden de\u011ferlendirilir.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"111,2,0\"><strong>Karar hi\u00e7 verilmiyorsa:<\/strong> M\u00fclakattan sonra 120 g\u00fcn ge\u00e7mi\u015fse \u00a7 1447(b) kapsam\u0131nda federal mahkemeye ba\u015fvurulabilir; m\u00fclakat \u00f6ncesi gecikmelerde mandamus\/APA davas\u0131 g\u00fcndeme gelebilir.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"112\">Cezai ge\u00e7mi\u015f, tutuklama kayd\u0131, good moral character, vergiler, \u00e7ocuk yard\u0131m\u0131, continuous residence, ge\u00e7mi\u015f evlilikler ve \u00f6nceki g\u00f6\u00e7menlik s\u00fcre\u00e7leri naturalization sonucunu do\u011frudan etkileyebilir. Bu nedenle herhangi bir komplikasyon bulunan dosyalarda ba\u015fvurudan \u00f6nce kapsaml\u0131 bir hukuki de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00f6nemlidir.<\/p>\n<h2 data-path-to-node=\"113\"><strong>Bize Ula\u015f\u0131n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"114\">Vatanda\u015fl\u0131k ba\u015fvurunuz reddedildiyse, N-336 s\u00fcrecindeyseniz, m\u00fclakat\u0131n\u0131zdan sonra 120 g\u00fcnden fazla s\u00fcredir karar bekliyorsan\u0131z ya da dosyan\u0131zda cezai ge\u00e7mi\u015f, vergi, continuous residence veya \u00f6nceki g\u00f6\u00e7menlik ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131zla ilgili bir sorun bulunuyorsa, hangi hukuki se\u00e7eneklere sahip oldu\u011funuzu de\u011ferlendirmek i\u00e7in deneyimli avukatlar\u0131m\u0131zdan destek alabilirsiniz.<\/p>\n<h3 data-section-id=\"dt24ex\" data-start=\"861\" data-end=\"873\"><strong>\u0130leti\u015fim<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p data-start=\"875\" data-end=\"914\"><strong>201-957-0909<\/strong><br data-start=\"890\" data-end=\"893\" \/><strong><a href=\"mailto:info@mclawfirm.com\" rel=\"noopener\" data-start=\"896\" data-end=\"914\">info@mclawfirm.com<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<h3 data-section-id=\"1fjtqnz\" data-start=\"916\" data-end=\"935\"><strong>Bizi Takip Edin<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p data-start=\"937\" data-end=\"964\" data-is-last-node=\"\" data-is-only-node=\"\"><strong>Instagram:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/mustafacetinesq\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">@mustafacetinesq<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ABD vatanda\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (naturalization) ba\u015fvurdunuz ve USCIS ba\u015fvurunuzu reddetti. Peki bundan sonra ne olur? USCIS&#8217;in ret karar\u0131 s\u00fcrecin sonu mudur? Hay\u0131r, en az\u0131ndan her zaman de\u011fil. ABD vatanda\u015fl\u0131k hukukunun en \u00f6nemli \u00f6zelliklerinden biri, naturalization kararlar\u0131n\u0131n hem idari hem de yarg\u0131sal denetime tabi olmas\u0131d\u0131r. USCIS bir N-400 ba\u015fvurusunu reddetti\u011finde, \u00f6nce Form N-336 ile idari inceleme (hearing), ard\u0131ndan [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":10921,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10911","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-yasal"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mclawfirm.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10911","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mclawfirm.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mclawfirm.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mclawfirm.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mclawfirm.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10911"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/mclawfirm.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10911\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10929,"href":"https:\/\/mclawfirm.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10911\/revisions\/10929"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mclawfirm.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10921"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mclawfirm.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10911"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mclawfirm.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10911"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mclawfirm.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10911"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}